Non-invasive urine test provides game changer in bladder cancer

New Bladder Cancer diagnostic test provides a unique combination of high sensitivity and negative predictive value

Lisbon, Portugal 21st October 2017. A new non-invasive urine test for bladder cancer providing a clear cut ‘yes/no’ result within three hours was launched at the 37th Société Internationale D’Urologie (SIU) meeting in Lisbon, Portugal, October 19-22, 2017. A study involving 577 patients, presented at an SIU symposium* today, showed the ADXBLADDER test was extremely reliable, demonstrating a sensitivity of 95% for higher risk cancers and a negative predictive value greater than 97%. The ADXBLADDER, produced by Arquer Diagnostics, received its CE Mark on 11th October 2017.

ADXBLADDER is a real game changer in the field of bladder cancer testing. Our data demonstrates ADXBLADDER has one of the highest sensitivities and negative predictive values of any urine test for bladder cancer diagnosis and additionally offers innovative features, such as the result being unaffected by urinary tract infections (UTIs) and no requirement for samples to be sent away to specialist labs for analysis,” said Mr. Stuart McCracken, the study principal investigator.

ADXBLADDER has the potential to make non-invasive testing for bladder cancer a clinical reality. It could help to diagnose patients earlier in the disease and offer dramatic improvements in quality of life and safety by reducing the need for cystoscopy and CT scanning,” said Mr. Tim Dudderidge, a study investigator.

The European Association of Urology currently recommends cystoscopy in all patients with haematuria and that cystoscopy cannot be replaced by cytology or any other non-invasive tests currently on the market. (1) The EAU guidelines also state that renal and bladder ultrasound may be used as part of the initial work-up and CT urography should be performed only in selected high-risk tumours. Nevertheless many CT urograms are performed in patients with visible and non-visible haematuria to exclude upper tract urothelial cancer, following guidance from the American Urological Association.(1) CT urograms, which use X-rays to construct detailed 2-D images of the bladder, have the disadvantage of exposing patients to ionizing radiation.

Cystoscopy, where the surgeon inserts a flexible cystoscope through the urethra to examine the inside of the urethra and bladder for signs of disease, is an undignified, invasive and uncomfortable procedure. Furthermore, cystoscopy exposes patients to the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs), known to occur in up to 5% of cases undergoing cystoscopy (2), and used on its own misses up to 30% of bladder tumours. (3) (4) Cystoscopy also comes with additional health economic disadvantages including high costs, lengthy procedures and long waiting lists. For urine cytology, a sample of urine is examined under the microscope to check for cancer or precancerous cells. The downside of cytology is that a negative result does not exclude the presence of a tumour, cytology has a low sensitivity and interpretation is user dependent. (1)

“There is an urgent need for an alternative reliable investigation that provides reassurance but without the cost or risks of CT,” said Mr. Dudderidge, a Urology Surgeon from University Hospital, Southampton.


The new ADXBLADDER test is based on measuring levels of a protein called MCM5, which is a marker of cells that are replicating, or still have the capability to replicate (i.e. are not terminally differentiated). Such cells are normally only found in basal layers of the epithelium, but when a mass of replicating cells is present (as occurs in bladder cancer), MCM5 cells are shed into body fluids. MCM5 in the urine is indicative of undifferentiated cells in an inappropriate location. Detection utilizes standard Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methodology, using mouse monoclonal antibodies to identify MCM5 antigens.

An important feature of ADXBLADDER is that the test is not influenced by infections or inflammation. Bacteria do not contain MCM5 proteins and inflammatory cells are already differentiated and therefore do not express the MCM5 protein.

“It’s a simple test that provides a ‘yes/ no’ answer according to whether there’s been a colour change in the ELISA. An additional advantage is that the test uses standard ELISA kits, available in most hospital laboratories, and therefore won’t need samples sending away for analysis,” said Mr. McCracken, a Urology Surgeon from Newcastle University and Sunderland Royal Hospital, UK.


In the ADXBLADDER blinded prospective study, between August 2016 and February 2017, 577 patients (318 male and 248 female) attending diagnostic haematuria clinics at six UK centres underwent ADXBLADDER ELISA testing. The results from the ADXBLADDER test were then compared to the current benchmark of combined results from cystoscopy, ultrasound and CT scanning.

The exclusion criteria for the study were patients with known kidney stones, or who had suffered previous bladder, prostate or kidney cancer.

The investigators found that 7.96% of the tests (n=46) were positive for cancer and 92.1 % (n=532) negative. The results showed:

  • The sensitivity for the combined high risk and muscle invasive groups was 95% (high risk groups 92%; muscle invasive groups 100%). [Sensitivity is the test’s ability to correctly detect patients who have bladder cancer].
  • The overall sensitivity for the study was 76%. (High risk 92%; muscle invasive group 100%; intermediate risk 75%; low risk 50%).
  • The overall specificity was 69%. [Specificity (also called the true negative rate) measures the proportion of negatives that are correctly identified as such (e.g. the percentage of haematuria patients without bladder cancer who are correctly identified by ADX as not having bladder cancer).
  • The negative predictive value (NPV) was 97%. [The NPV is the proportion of patients who test negative who are indeed true negatives].

“Having such a high negative predictive value is really important, because if your test is negative you can be 97% confident that the patient doesn’t have cancer,” said Mr. McCracken.

The investigators, he added, had not been unduly concerned by poorer performance in low grade disease. “The rate of progression of low grade bladder tumours is low and furthermore, these patients will re-present with symptoms in the interim period. What’s really important is that ADXBLADDER achieved very good sensitivity in high risk patients and those with muscle invasive disease, where cancer is likely to spread quickly, and prognosis is much poorer”, said Mr. McCracken.

Future uses of ADXBLADDER

At the symposium Mr. Dudderidge, considered some future uses for ADXBLADDER. ADXBLADDER, he said, could have an important role to play in diagnosing women with bladder cancer more quickly. Although men are known to be three to four times more likely to develop bladder cancer, women are more likely to die from the disease. (5) Studies show that 57% of men survive bladder for five years or more compared with just 46% of women. (6) (7) (8) Delayed diagnosis and women suffering from rarer forms of the disease are considered to be among the possible factors explaining this disparity.

One reason for the delay in diagnosis is that women are less likely to undergo assessment for haematuria due to suffering more commonly from urinary infections (which can cause similar bladder symptoms and blood in the urine just like bladder cancer). Studies suggest that around 50 to 60% of all women develop UTIs over the course of their life-time, and that UTIs occur more often in women than men at a ratio of 8:1. (9) (10) “The reality is that women who suffer from recurrent UTIs may not bother to go to the GP if they spot visible blood, and additionally GPs may just prescribe antibiotics and not investigate them further,” said Mr. Dudderidge.

The ADXBLADDER test, he suggested, could be positioned to differentiate bladder cancer from UTIs at an early stage and be offered to women who have unresolved blood in the urine after two weeks of UTI treatment. “The availability of an accurate, easy and affordable urine test will reduce the barriers to testing women with persisting urinary symptoms and permit earlier diagnosis of bladder cancer which could make a real difference to their outcomes,” said Mr. Dudderidge.

The test, he added, could additionally be used in patients who have been treated for high risk bladder cancer and now require regular monitoring for recurrence. “Such high risk patients can be required to undergo cystoscopy testing up to every three months initially and then for the rest of their lives. Given the choice most would adopt a urine test in a heart-beat if they thought it offered a safe alternative to invasive cystoscopy.”

Notes to editor

*The symposium ‘A Breakthrough in Non-invasive Bladder Cancer’ was held at 17.00 on Saturday 21st October at the Société Internationale D’Urologie meeting in Lisbon, Portugal.
Mr. Stuart McCracken and Mr. Tim Dudderidge are available for interview
For further information contact:
Julia Kendrick
Kendrick PR
Mobile: +44 (0)7890711037

About Arquer Diagnostics Ltd
ADXBLADDER, a non-invasive bladder cancer diagnostic test, is the first product to be launched by Arquer Diagnostics. Arquer Diagnostics, launched in 2015, is a company based on the development of non-invasive cancer diagnostic tests using the MCM5 (minichromosome maintenance protein) platform. The company arose from UroSens, a small enterprise founded by Nick Miller-Jones in 2005. The mission of Arquer Diagnostics is to deliver accurate, rapid, minimally invasive oncology diagnostic products. Arquer Diagnostics, who are headquartered in Sunderland, United Kingdom, are supported by an international medical advisory board. ADXBLADDER is currently commercialized in UK, France, Italy, Turkey and the Nordic region and will be further released to other European countries and worldwide regions in 2018.

More information can be found at

Leave a Reply